I have taught myself all forms of Technical and Fundamental analysis methods over the years. As you have seen in this blog, I am particularly interested in Elliott wave analysis. It is no secret that I am very familiar with all sort of strategies, including my own, the Sarmiento System. All stocks that have entered long-term rallies have, at some point, jump in high volume and more than 5% in value. One may be selective, training oneself to recognize "the catalyst" or reason why a stock would jump, and select the most likely candidates. However, you still are at the mercy of the markets, and unless you can see the future, no amount of Technical Analysis can prepare you for the surprise an earnings report may bring.
In the late 90's, it was easy! just buy a call and sell it when it has doubled in price. That could happen in days, or even hours in some cases. But that was then, and this is now. My Elliott wave analysis has brought me to the conclusion that the rally from 1987 to 2000 was a double zigzag, and that the decline to October 2002 was also a double zigzag. It follows that the current fake bull market (as I would like to call it) is also a double zigzag. This double zigzag may have concluded or may be close to conclusion. My point is, because we are in a bear market, it is only natural to find a selective list of stocks performing very nicely, but most stocks correct strongly, after brief bull runs. It follows that stock picking is a dangerous game in this environment. It is not surprising that most options trading have met frustration and self doubt.
Francis Bacon said :"If a person will begin with certainties, he will end in doubts, but if he would be content to begin with doubts, he will end in certainties"
I began a journey in Sept. 2002, at what turned out to be near the bottom of the market, searching for an options' strategy that would allow me to apply a capital that I had accumulated over years of hard work, to conservatively grow my portfolio in any market, despite the possibility that the bear market would continue for years to come. I realized I had more doubts than certainties at the time. I believe I am closer to the certainty I set out to find.
I have tried everything I could find about options and options strategies. I have come to believe that there is little I could learn from professionals and Gurus. There are few strategies that I have not already tried, using real money, paper trading and back testing, using some very expensive software, you have seen me use. Inevitably, the only constant I have found is doubt and the only certainty is random results. I also believe that there is no such thing as LUCK but rather success is what occurs when preparedness meets opportunity. Hence I have prepared, so I can substitute my days of doubt sprinkled with faith for days of faith sprinkled with doubt. Success is at hand because I have toiled, and my doubts are fewer and fewer.
Indeed, the certainty of random results, even in the face of carefully considered variables when entering a trade can only be reasonably endured with the use of probabilities. It is my job, I believe, to prepare for every contingency and only consider myself successful when the majority of my trades have returned me some gains. Not necessarily big gains, only some gains. I do not aspire anymore to obtain large percentage gains in each trade. I don’t even aspire to have a large percentage of my trades win, I only aspire to have an overall positive performance in my portfolio. I have come to understand that I can only win if I set aside my doubts and just plunge in the adventure that is trading hoping to succeed with the large basket of knowledge and experience I've acquired that would only help me reduce the probability of failure. It is critical that I understand that I can and often am wrong, no matter what amount of analysis and evaluation I make, I do NOT know the future. I can only prepare to make the right decision at the right time with the certainty that I will be wrong often.
I have learned the Elliott wave as the panacea. As though it was the crystal ball that it is not. Yet, one needs to realize that it is a method to increase the probability of success, but not the only route to success. One needs to be hedged to prevent rapid loss. However, I am convinced that no amount of hedging will save you every time. I was told once that you can use different options strategies, such as long calls, bull call spreads, calendars and the more sophisticated PCCRC’s. You may even learn to recognize the best situations in which to apply them but invariably you will find that you cannot prevent loss. In the end, all that was accomplished, you will come to understand, is that you merely shifted risk from one Greek to another, but the risk is always there.
Recognizing these facts are painful because we have been told that options is the way to easy money. Since I have not made easy money, I could conclude that there is something wrong with me. Yet, since I am fairly well educated, I doubt very much that there is something wrong with me. I opened this blog to find like-minded traders from whom I could learn and exchange ideas. I have come to realize that, while I am not alone, I am not at the bottom of the pack. I have come to understand that I have mastered what is there to master, but in the end, the most money to be made with options is probably in the business “education”, not in the business of trading. Don’t be alarmed, I don’t intend to start a seminar business, I am happy with sharing what I know with no strings attached. I am hoping to continue to learn from others and apply what I have learned in some form here.
What is quite clear to me, is that one needs to focus in one strategy in particular, and try to apply that strategy, learn it well thus increasing the odds of success. The PCCRC has been profitable for me, particularly in stocks that break out to new highs. Ironically, I have made money to the up side as well as to the down side (I told you, the only certainty is that you will have random results). After several years in this journey, in the middle of an erratic bullish run in a bear market, I have learned the PCCRC well, and the Sarmiento System as a method to pick candidates at any time, in any market. If such candidates are not forthcoming, I can simply keep my hard earned money safe in cash.
Anyway, this is my recipe for success, but don’t let anyone tell you that somehow this is easy to learn or implement. If you don’t think that you have the time or will to put the necessary effort, you are probably better off looking for a day job.
Juan Sarmiento
For information about joining the private Stock of the Day group, please send an e-mail to Paperprofit1@mac.com
About Me
Blog Archive
Tuesday, May 16, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
Thank you very much for your insight and candor Juan. I'm an inexperienced trader who desparately wants to trade full time. However, I'm no where near my goal. One thing that I have learned is that options trading is not easy. Like anything else there will be growing pains. I tell myself daily that someday I will be a successful trader, and until that day arrives, I try to learn everything I can.
Juan, can you please recommend some good reading material on Elliot Wave?
Thanks again!
Hi bryan, thanks for joining us. The turn of the market may be the end of the double-zigzag counter trend "B" wave in the S&P500. The DOW itself formed a long-term double top, which looks quite scary. Even MSFT finally broke down after years of holding a trading range.
Today, more than ever, it would be important to be able to pick the market leaders, whether it is oil, metals or anything new... who knows.
I would NOT recommend that you leave your job to trade. Rather, it is time to learn, to prepare, and adjust your thinking with the fluctuations of the market. Come here, tell us about your experiences, ask questions, offer suggestions, no matter how basic they may appear to you, we can all learn from our collective experiences.
There is a lot of material in the Elliott wave varying from the very simple to the very complex; from the basic to the extensive. I would NOT recommend any book in particular because not every book covers it all in a way that can be practical to understand, whether you are a beginner or an experienced Elliottician. So you need to start SIMPLE, but be sure that you are thourough... Learn the details later.
Start with the Elliott Wave Principle by Frost and Prechter:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0471988499/sr=8-1/qid=1147928076/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-6201860-0541441?%5Fencoding=UTF8
Eventually, you will need to know all potential patterns, particularly the corrective ones. Visiting this blog will help with the practical approach because I have mastered all patterns. I will be posting examples here and there.
The Neely book is quite difficult to follow, but it DOES show the different patterns. Again, I feel uneasy about recommending this book.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0930233441/sr=8-1/qid=1147928044/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-6201860-0541441?%5Fencoding=UTF8
You can take the Elliottician.com Elliott Certification Course, which is quite expensive, but it is the only realistic way to recognize patterns objectively and confirm them instinctively.
I suggest you read the Frost and Prechter and come here with your questions and comments. I'd be happy to offer suggestions and get YOUR opinions on the record for others to benefit.
Juan,
RE: "If such candidates are not forthcoming, I can simply keep my hard earned money safe in cash."
That is perhaps the most important part about it. Not forcing the market, waiting for the trade that is best suited to a particular traders, way of trading.
Juan,
It is about waiting and being patient for an almost dead certianty. As you said when the odds are in your favour.
Hi Juan,
Thanks for your insight once again. Can you explain why you feel uneasy about this neely's book on EW?
rgds
huat ah!!! said: why you feel uneasy about this neely's book on EW?
whithin 5 mins of starting the book you'd feel that you just flushed $90 down the drain because it is very hard to follow, and it seems meant for a mathematical genius. I actually crated an Excel spreadsheet to enter data and get some schetched cound of some sort. It was extremely frustrated and when I actually got something done, my feeling was that I could not be sure that the procedure was done correctly.
BUT in later chapters, Neely DOES offer a comprehensive list of patterns of the corrective patterns. BUT are they worth the money? Trust me, I have learned them all but it is hardly a practical approach to learning. The alternative is to take a >$1000 seminar.
Juan,
From what you said here I can learn a lot, so thanks. It also says a lot about your honesty and generosity, as well as a desire to succeed. More power to you!
Are you trading full time now? Or, are you considering this?
I love trading high IV, and I love to neutralize two directional greeks, gamma and delta, so that I only worry about theta and vega.
Anyway, I'm reading your posts with gratitude. Danny
The gratitude is all mine. Your participating here, asking questions about my systems, etc. may help me see things I cannot see.
I hope to attract more people and perhaps one day justify my work with some advertising money (right now there isn't much), but my real motivation is to become a better trader with imput from all of you, so your questions are critical.
I DO have a consulting business that I operate from home, so I have plenty of time to trade. I have been working hard to make my trading a source of steady income so that I can go travel and have fun without worrying about money. I will let you know when I feel I have reached that goal. BUT so far, I would not recommend anyone to leave their jobs to do this full time. Success in trading is in large part emotional control. Such emotional control goes down the drain when you depend on trading for a living.
Juan
In the long run we will get better and succeed eventually.
I am currently looking for other PCCRC's but the volatility is high right now. I willl post when I see a good candidate.
It has become clear to me that this is the only good way to trade in this market.
Juan,
I've replied to your cup and handle question on the previous Blog.
Still in SBUX, but it has turned from a break even trade into one that is down about $1 for me.
Are you still in SBUX?
Hi Fortitude, remember that the PCCRC is meant to be a reactive form of trade. That is, if Delta increases, you sell calls, if Delta decreased, you sell puts, if Vega increases, you may close the position. It is up to you. Under most circumstances, you make money.
SBUX did approach $40 (when I was on vacation). There were several steps that you could have taken to reduce your cost while leaving the trade open for further profits. On Platinum, go back to 5/8/06, and do one of the following:
1. Sell 1/3 of your July calls.
OR
2. Cover your short calls and sell 2/3 of your long calls (leaving 1/3 long calls).
OR
3. Sell ALL of your long calls and buy a larger number of long calls at a higher strike price.
The resulting trade retains the Delta neutral character, while reducing your costs and taking profits.
You SHOULD always leave the entire trade if the I.V. of your longs approaches the historical IV for this underlying.
Having said all that, SBUX is trading near strike price, so you may continue to hold it because the volatility is on the increase. Pay cose attention to the IV charts and exit when your trade is in good profit.
I think that you are not profitable because you have done some rollovers without accounting for the profits taken on each rollovers. Do YOU have a record of your steps in Platinum?
Juan,
Excellent article. Can you please elaborate on what is "Sarmiento System" and what are the entry and exit guidelines.
Raj..
Post a Comment