For information about joining the private Stock of the Day group, please send an e-mail to Paperprofit1@mac.com

Blog Archive

Monday, February 18, 2008

What makes you lose money with the PCCRC????

I will be on your face and say:

1. Not following the rules.
2. Impatience.
3. Experimenting.

Yet, if I had not done any of these three things I would have learned nothing. So free yourself from the 3 items above once and a while, but be prepared to lose money. By the way, it is a lot easier to lose in one trade when you are winning in most of your trades, so be free to experiment, but also implement the PCCRC strategies I have outlined and see if you can reproduce them first.

Now, here is a theoretical answer that would apply in most cases when the trades do not work out:

Options depend on the GREEKS. That is Theta, Delta, Vega and Gamma. I have said that Theta, Delta and Vega are three horses pulling a carriage. Let’s use the Greek chariot, instead. You can include Gamma if you will. Greeks may work individually or in combination to generate profits. The way you may lose, of course, would be if ALL of the 3 Greeks work against you at one time. That is: the stock goes down in low volatility. You still have the hope that the stock may continue to go down sufficiently to give you profits or IV might spike or the stock may go back to your striking price. In most cases, you just as soon get out with small loses, rather than stay indefinitely in a trade that may or may not fix itself.

By far, the most influential of the Greeks is Vega. A 5% increase in Vega can be sufficient to produce a 200% return on risk. Most option trading strategies AVOID Vega. With Condors, you want to make money from Theta decay while avoiding the impact of a Vega impact, although your trade remains susceptible to Delta. With vertical spreads, you neutralize Vega, but you expose yourself to a decline in Delta (for bullish spreads) or a rise in Delta (in bearish spreads). The only one of the common trade strategies that benefits from Vega spikes is the straddle, but we know how susceptible it is to time decay. Only the PCCRC takes advantage of the 3 Greeks, and even the forth Greek (in some scenarios).

When you place a PCCRC you decide not to control Vega, take it by the horns so-to-speak as if it were a bull, but rather to ride it. So instead of a bull out of control that needs to be tamed, I think of Vega as a powerful horse pulling my Greek chariot. For that, though we need to “buy low and sell high….” VOLATILITY! To be specific, we need to buy low Implied Volatility and sell high volatility.

But you need to control Delta and Theta. When you enter one of my strategies, you anticipate that the stock is going to go UP. In fact, the configurations of my risk graphs appear to be more bullish than bearish, but that is only apparent because Vega is likely to reduce in an up-trending market while increase in a down-trending market. Even if your up-trending market surprisingly reverses and goes down, you can count on Vega to carry the day, and make you profits when you expected losses.

Occasionally, however, IV may decline and the stock might move sideways. In such cases the decay of the front month options may decay sufficiently to justify your staying in the trade month after month until finally Delta or Vega move sufficiently to give you strong profits. As expiration Friday approaches, I make a decision to exit the trade or rollover my shorts to the following months. My decision should be based on the merits of the resulting trade, and not on the past performance of the trade thus far.

So what could cause me to lose money? A decline in stock price with a simultaneous decline in volatility could. In such cases, all three Greeks will work against me as Theta would not be of much help, since the front month puts may increase in value with the decline. I have also experienced sudden IV declines following news releases. Imagine a balloon being filled in advance of a news item, which it then deflated once the news are out. The news, such as earnings released, must be anticipated as to their occurrence, if not their content. One the news is out, uncertainty is removed and so is the fuel for Vega.

Now you may say, I am not a full time trader, I cannot be watchful of Vega, I need to be at work. Well I designed my strategies to be able to go out on vacation for extended periods of time in far away places and still make money. In advance of my trip, I may rollover my short options to the next month, assuming that I will be back 1 week before expiration. If earnings is to occur while I am away, I may as well exit the trade. I prefer to enter right after earnings because then I will have 90 days for the trade to work, without my constant watchful eye. Besides, right after earnings, IV will decline in most stocks, so I known Vega will be on my side. If you the IV of the underlying you are interested in does not decline after earnings, Avoid that trade!

You may say: I have seen you adjust many of your trades, you obviously watch your trades every day! Now remember, I am a full time trader not because I must, but because I want to. If I go on a long trip, and come back and see that I missed to top of profits in one trade, let’s say 200% return on risk, and it is now 50% return or risk, I just have to say to myself, what could be better than earning 50% with a minimum effort? This is important, because the 150% difference between the two trades would be my salary if I were a full time trader, and then you’d have to subtract whatever the S&P500 would have made me during the time I was way. So yes, I have given you many clues on what to do to luck in profits they accumulate during the life of the trade, but I assure you, you’ll do just fine, even if you don’t change a thing.

There is one more, VERY important thing: The PCCRC strategy has very natural decision points, both to enter and to exit: earnings and expiration. Be aware of those two dates for every trade you place. Be sure to exit in advance of either, and you’ll do fine. It is at these two points where you should be ready to realize your loses (or profits) and move on!

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Greetings,

I just listened to your interview on TraderInterviews.com and found it very interesting. I have been browsing through you blog and I think I have a good grasp of the PCCRC strategy and how to adjust it from month to month. That being said I have also been playing around with it and looking at a variation. (On paper only, of course) But I do not know if it would work. I was hoping to ask you for your thoughts. I doubt that my thoughts are revolutionary or original. So with your years of experience with PCCRC you have probably already investigated this or something similar in the evolution of your trading.

My objective was to reduce the initial outlay of capital and collect more premium along the way.

What if:

We open a position with 2 straight calendar straddles, (-2C, -2P / +2C, +2P)

10 Days before the first expiration we look at which set of shorts, the calls or puts, are in the money. We buy back the ITM short options and resell the same strike in the next month, but we only sell half of the original number of contracts. This will obviously be done for a debit. But the gain in your long options may offset the cost. The OTM short options can either be left alone to expire worthless with new short sold after expiration. Or simply rolled 1-for-1 to the next month. Our position now looks like this: (-1C, -2P / +2C, +2P)

If the stock price remains above our straddle strike then we continue to roll the short calls and puts in a 1-to-1 ratio.

If the stock price drops below our straddle strike then we buy back the short puts and sell half as many in the next month plus we sell an additional call making our position: (-2C, -1P / +2C, +2P)

If the stock continues to drop and our puts are DITM and we wish to sell 1 DITM put and buy 2 ATM or 2OTM puts why not also sell another near month put at the same strike price. So basiclly you would be turning your 1 DITM put into one side of a PCCRC at the lower put strike. The same could be done with the calls should we be in a bull market.

On the surface it looks like this would bring in additional premium on the OTM legs but still allow unlimited gain on the ITM legs.

Your thoughts?

Thank you.

Ed

Juan Sarmiento said...

Ed said:
That being said I have also been playing around with [the PCCRC] and looking at a variation. (On paper only, of course) But I do not know if it would work. I was hoping to ask you for your thoughts. I doubt that my thoughts are revolutionary or original. So with your years of experience with PCCRC you have probably already investigated this or something similar in the evolution of your trading.

Juan: Ed, don’t assume that I have tested it all. Please feel free to explore and bring your thoughts to the attention of the visitors here. Your input and ideas will always be appreciated here. I have always made the case that I am not a Guru, but just another trader, just like you, bringing my ideas for discussion and sharing.

My objective was to reduce the initial outlay of capital and collect more premium along the way.

What if:

We open a position with 2 straight calendar straddles, (-2C, -2P / +2C, +2P)

10 Days before the first expiration we look at which set of shorts, the calls or puts, are in the money. We buy back the ITM short options and resell the same strike in the next month, but we only sell half of the original number of contracts. This will obviously be done for a debit. But the gain in your long options may offset the cost. The OTM short options can either be left alone to expire worthless with new short sold after expiration. Or simply rolled 1-for-1 to the next month. Our position now looks like this: (-1C, -2P / +2C, +2P)

If the stock price remains above our straddle strike then we continue to roll the short calls and puts in a 1-to-1 ratio.

If the stock price drops below our straddle strike then we buy back the short puts and sell half as many in the next month plus we sell an additional call making our position: (-2C, -1P / +2C, +2P)

If the stock continues to drop and our puts are DITM and we wish to sell 1 DITM put and buy 2 ATM or 2OTM puts why not also sell another near month put at the same strike price. So basiclly you would be turning your 1 DITM put into one side of a PCCRC at the lower put strike. The same could be done with the calls should we be in a bull market.

On the surface it looks like this would bring in additional premium on the OTM legs but still allow unlimited gain on the ITM legs.


Your thoughts?



Thank you.

Ed

Ed, this is a completely different approach than my PCCRC, and should be investigated as such, rather than instead of the PCCRC. I would encourage you to suggest examples and situations in which you would proceed as you suggest.

How is this different from the PCCRC? Well, the goal of the PCCRC is to profit from Vega, Delta and Theta each individually alone or in combination. The PCCRC, as I have implemented it, is reactive, rather than proactive, so if a stock is going DOWN I would take profits by selling puts, rather than buying new ones. If the stock goes sideways, I can rollover my shorts, taking a credit every month, thus profiting from Theta. If implied volatility jumps, then I might exit the trade. So you see, the PCCRC is like a carriage pulled by three horses, when one fails the others pick up the slack.

When you start with a calendar (same number of shorts and longs), you are playing a calendar spread, which depends on Theta alone. You have in effect, neutralized Delta and Vega, so you are no longer going to benefit from any jump in volatility or a strong movement in price. In fact, you may lose money if the stock goes strongly in either direction. Just yesterday, one of my paper trades, EOG, had huge gains as the stock jumped from $95 when I entered only a couple of weeks ago, to $130. My reaction was not to become more bullish, but to take profits by selling calls. Today, the stock is down, and I am profiting from an increase in Vega since yesterday. If I had a calendar spread, I would be losing money. Adjusting a losing trade is NOT what I recommend anyone to do.

This is not to say that you could not work out your trade very well, that is yet to be seen because I have practically no experience with double calendars. So be sure to papertrade your strategy. Right down your own rules and even back test it and refine it. Bring us some examples so we can all discuss and exchange ideas on what to do. I will evaluate the strategy as you suggest and give you more input.

I am looking forward to more exchanges with you!!

Thanks for the contribution.

Anonymous said...

Has anyone used synthetics with the PCCRC strategy? It is possible to setup straddles, both long & short, synthetically. Does anyone know if anything can be gained by setting up the trades this way?

Juan Sarmiento said...

Not that I know of...

But the PCCRC is a capital intensive trade to begin with. What purpose would it serve to buy stock instead of long or short calls/puts??

How would that synthetic trade would look like?
Stock + long put -short call -short put?

What about the effect of Vega? I make a lot of money on Vega which could be lost with stock... Wouldn't it?

EWI